By Craig Holdrege
Download the article: Science a Process or Dogma?
A Waldorf high school science teacher stands before a wonderful and yet difficult task. We need to be at home in modern scientific research in the fields in which we are teaching, but we also need to transcend the narrow confines of the theory-driven, reductionist approach so widespread in science and science teaching today. Much of what we learn about science today has a dogmatic character - we learn about theories as if they were hard facts and not ways of interpreting the phenomena. Where textbooks and the Discovery channel offer answers, a Waldorf science teacher should be raising questions. We need to penetrate to the facts, to the actual scientific process. This is by no means easy.
In the following essay I describe a famous example from evolutionary biology that I gradually realized was much more complicated and problematic than my textbook knowledge. I now cringe at the thought that I had been passing this example on to my students. I came to see how this example can show the pitfalls and promises of so much science teaching today. I hope this essay will stimulate other science teachers to think more critically about the examples they use in the classroom to “prove” a point. I also hope non-scientists will benefit through the journey and gain a clearer, and more critical view of how science works. I offer one more prefacing remark: Waldorf schools are sometimes criticized for being soft on science or, even worse, for teaching pseudo-science. Such criticism may be valid in individual cases, but it cannot be directed at the Goethean, phenomenological methodology, which lies (or rather should lie) at the heart of Waldorf science teaching. This essay can at very least show that a Goethean approach in which one views participation on the part of the scientist as a central part of science - leads to a critical and reflective view of science that protects both student and teacher from dogmatism. And dogmatism should be the enemy of every science teacher. To help students view and experience science as a living process, and not as a teaching or an edifice of “facts” is, in my view, a far truer embodiment of the scientific spirit than much of what one finds today around the globe in classrooms and textbooks.